Campaigners Question Local Police Preparedness for Nuclear Convoy Incident

NUKEWATCH SCOTLAND
 
Press Release: 10th October 2016
CAMPAIGNERS QUESTION LOCAL POLICE PREPAREDNESS FOR NUCLEAR CONVOY INCIDENT
 
The citizen monitoring group Nukewatch, which observes and reports on the movement of nuclear weapons within the UK, has written to Scotland’s top police officer to express concern about the apparent unpreparedness of local police to respond to any incident involving the convoys. See letter text below.
The worry has arisen from recent conversations between campaigners and local police officers, as nuclear weapon convoys have been passing, which have indicated that the officers concerned are wholly unaware of the nature of the traffic and its attendant risks.
Nukewatch understands that local police are called to attend when convoy personnel notice protesters at the roadside or following the convoy in cars. Local traffic police can also be involved in traffic management as the convoys pass through.
In their letter to Chief Constable Philip Gormley the campaigners say:
“This is troubling on two counts. These officers could be attending an emergency situation involving a convoy and be completely unprepared, by their lack of specific knowledge and training, to take appropriate action. That is a question of critical competence. Secondly, they might be exposing themselves to particular and serious risks of which they had not been advised. That represents a serious failure of an employer’s duty of care to employees.”
David Mackenzie said:
“It is frankly astonishing that Police Scotland can be so complacent in the face of the serious and potentially catastrophic risks posed by the transport of nuclear warheads on public roads. It seems that they are content to let the MoD deal with any incident in spite of the fact that accident simulation exercises in the series Exercises Senator have repeatedly highlighted poor inter-agency co-ordination in acted-out scenarios. Under the Civil Contingencies Act (2004) so-called First Responders, such as the emergency and health services must carry out risk assessments of identified threats. It appears that Police Scotland are failing to comply with the Act.”
Contacts:
David Mackenzie    07876593016
Jane Tallents           07778267833
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The Chief Constable
Police Scotland
PO Box 21629 
STIRLING FK7 1EN
 
Dear Philip Gormley,
Police Scotland officers and nuclear weapon convoys
 
Nukewatch is a citizen monitoring group which observes and reports on the movement of nuclear weapons and weapon-related nuclear materials within the UK.
We have a particular concern to raise with you. During our observations of recent nuclear weapon convoys travelling to and from Coulport we have had roadside conversations with a number of Police Scotland officers who have attended as we watched the convoys pass or followed the convoys in our own vehicles. What appears to happen is that convoy personnel alert local police to our presence.
Our concern is that a number of these officers have been completely and genuinely unaware of the nature of the traffic. This is troubling on two counts. These officers could be attending an emergency situation involving a convoy and be completely unprepared, by their lack of specific knowledge and training, to take appropriate action. That is a question of critical competence. Secondly, they might be exposing themselves to particular and serious risks of which they had not been advised. That represents a serious failure of an employer’s duty of care to employees.
Does Police Scotland have any kind of process for giving all officers the essential information about nuclear weapon convoys?  Does Police Scotland provide training to its officers on how to respond in the case of an emergency involving a nuclear weapon convoys, so that their actions will mesh effectively with those of the Ministry of Defence in the context of the LAESI guidelines?
We look forward to hearing from you
Nukewatch
Share

New report highlights warhead convoy accident record

noh

Convoys which transport the UK’s Trident nuclear warheads have been involved in a series of collisions, breakdowns, and equipment failures, according to a new report by an award-winning journalist.

The report, written by the Sunday Herald’s Rob Edwards and published by the International Campaign for the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), puts a spotlight on the safety record of high security convoys which regularly carry nuclear weapons across the UK.

According to previously unpublished information revealed in response to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act, convoys transporting defence nuclear materials and warheads were involved in 24 ‘operational incidents’ and 19 ‘engineering incidents’ over the period January 2013 to July 2016.

Over this period the convoy was involved in three minor collisions: twice in May 2013, when two convoy vehicles collided with each other and when a convoy escort vehicle collided with a parked civilian vehicle, and again in January 2014, when an escort vehicle collided with a car at a Ministry of Defence (MoD) base during a rest stop.

In September 2015 one of the trucks which transports nuclear weapons lost power and broke down soon after leaving a military site, and convoy escort vehicles twice broke down and were declared unserviceable during convoy journeys in November 2013 and July 2015. Adverse weather affected convoy journeys in November 2013, forcing a route change, and in January 2014, when a rolling police blockade was set up to safeguard the convoy during snowy conditions, and the convoy was stopped by protesters on three occasions.

The new revelations bring the total number of reported safety incidents affecting the nuclear convoy since 2000 to 180. This is in addition to eight accidents which are known to have taken place between 1960 and 1991, the most serious of which occurred in January 1987 when a convoy vehicle carrying nuclear warheads skidded and overturned on an icy road in Wiltshire.

The report lists a series of credible accident scenarios that could trigger fires, explosions or a breach of containment, resulting in the release of plutonium and other radioactive materials from warheads. Evidence cited from an MoD report suggests that in extreme circumstances an accident could even trigger an “inadvertent yield” – a nuclear reaction leading to a large-scale release of radiation short of a full nuclear explosion. A terrorist attack on a nuclear convoy, according to the MoD, could cause “considerable loss of life and severe disruption both to the British people’s way of life and to the UK’s ability to function effectively as a sovereign state”.

The report simulates the results of an accident involving a nuclear weapon in five places through which the warhead convoy has travelled: Birmingham, Preston, Wetherby, Newcastle and Glasgow. In each case the people, hospitals, schools, universities, roads, railway stations and airports that could be contaminated and disrupted are identified, assuming that an accident would spread contamination up to ten kilometres from the scene of the crash, depending on which way the wind was blowing.

In Birmingham, for example, a nuclear convoy crash on the M6 at Spaghetti Junction near the city could put more than 1.3 million people at risk of radioactive contamination. Within a ten-kilometre radius there are over 400 schools, 38 railway stations and 18 hospitals that could be disrupted.

The report quotes independent nuclear engineer John Large as warning that a multiple crash and fire involving a warhead carrier would pose a significant – and plausible – risk to the public. “The inclusion of a flammable chemical tanker in the pile-up would add to the ferocity and, particularly if the incident occurred in a longish bridge underpass or similar, fire temperatures would be very demanding on the containment of the warhead carriers,” he said.

If the containment is breached, high explosives could catch fire or explode, he warned. “Once that happens then the enriched uranium and plutonium components will also be consumed by fire and, without effective containment, liberate some very fine plutonium dioxide particles.” The consequences of this would be very hard to mitigate and very long lasting, potentially contaminating significant areas of land and posing long term health impacts.

The report states that although emergency exercises run by the MoD rehearse disaster scenarios in which multiple crashes lead to fires, explosions and the spread of radioactive contamination over cities, post-mortem reports from six exercises reveal that the MoD and the emergency services would have serious difficulties dealing with such disasters. Post-mortems “make the same points year after year”, because many of the same problems keep recurring, suggesting that “lessons are not learnt”, and that “issues with delays, communications and co-ordination are rediscovered every time”, which “does not bode well should there ever be a serious accident”.

 

Download the ICAN report here.

Share

Nuclear Weapons Convoy Stopped Twice!– Sept 2016

glencorse-cropped
Glencorse Barracks, Penicuik.

A convoy left Burghfield on the morning of 14th Sept and went east to the M25 and then north on the A1. By late afternoon it turned off the A1 into RAF Leeming for the night. On the 15th it continued on the A1 stopped for a break at RAF Boulmer and then heading to the Edinburgh bypass. After turning off for a break at Glencorse Barracks it continued on the Edinburgh bypass and the M8 and M9 to Stirling.

brian-at-stirling
Brian Quail being removed from under convoy escort vehicle.

As it left the motorway and passed below Stirling Castle it was halted by two protesters. Brian Quail and Alasdair Ibbotson calmly slowed one vehicle then stopped the one after it. As Alasdair lay in the road Brian wriggled underneath it. It took 15 minutes to get them removed and the convoy rolling again. Video here

As it emerged at the other end of the Stirling road (A811) at Balloch it was again halted, this time by two members of Faslane Peace Camp. Video here. Eventually it made it to Coulport around 7pm.

balloch-stop-1
Faslane Peace Campers halt convoy in Balloch

It left again to travel south on the morning of 19 Sept, heading through Stirling and down the M80 to join the M74. After Penrith it turned East along the A66 towards  Scotch Corner and the A1.

It was back in Burghfield on the morning of 21 Sept

Press coverage

STV news
Scotsman
Telegraph
Common Space
The National
Daily Mail online
 

Share

Nuclear Weapons Convoy – July 2016

douglas-pic-1
Warhead convoy on M74 near Abington

A convoy left Burghfield in the early hours of 7th July and headed up the west route via the M6 and then the  M74, passing Abington at 1.40pm . It continued on the M80 to Stirling for  4.30pm and arrived at Coulport at about 6pm.

les-balloch-cropped
Convoy passing through Balloch 7 July 2016

It  left Coulport again on morning of the 11th July and then travelled through Stirling to the Edinburgh bypass where it turned off for lunch at Glencorse barracks.  It then returned to the bypass and took the A68 south eventually getting to Burghfield by 6am the next day.

Share

Nuclear Weapons Convoy – May 2016

A convoy including  four warhead carriers left AWE Burghfield on the morning of 18th May. It headed up the M40 to the M6 and then North to take a break in Preston around 5pm. Then it continued on to Scotland on the M74 passing around the south of Glasgow after midnight to then cross the Erskine Bridge, go through Dumbarton and arrive at Coulport around 1.30am on May 19th.

It was back in Burghfield on the 24th May.

Share

Nuclear weapons convoy March 2016 – stopped!

convoy stopped by Brian Q Balloch 10 March 2016A nuclear warhead convoy left AWE Burghfield in the early hours of Thur March 10th. It travelled up the West side of the country stopping in at Preston then continuing up the M6 to Scotland to be met by Scottish Nukewatchers. Going North on the M74 it turned off on the M73 to join the M80 then went into Stirling DSG for a break. After that it turned West along the A811 to Balloch where protester Brian Quail from Glasgow walked out onto the pedestrian crossing and stopped it. After about 5 minutes enough police were gathered to carry Brian out of the road and the convoy continued up the side of Loch Lomond, arriving at Coulport at around 6pm

This convoy then left Coulport for its return journey around 10.30am on Monday 14 March. It went to Stirling where it was filmed by Stirling Uni CND group before stopping in the DSG for a break. It then went south on the M80 and M73 where it was again filmed at Baillieston junction at 2pm on the outskirts of Glasgow before heading down the M74.

The convoy was then seen again by Nukewatchers on the M40 near Banbury at around 2am. It then took the A34 passing Oxford and going onto the M4 to head East to arrive at Burghfield at 3.40am.

 

Share

Nuclear weapons convoy: February 2016

A nuclear weapons convoy left AWE Burghfield in Berkshire on the morning of Wednesday 10 February. After an overnight stop in Yorkshire it travelled on into Scotland on the A1, passing Edinburgh and Stirling before arriving at RNAD Coulport at just before 7.00 pm on Thursday 11 February.

The return trip began on the morning of Monday 15 February, with the convoy passing Stirling before travelling along the Edinburgh Bypass, where it was photographed by a number of members of the public before stopping for a rest break at Glencorse Barracks at Penicuik. It then continued along the A1 past Newcastle before stopping overnight again in Yorkshire. The convoy arrived back at AWE Burghfield early evening on Tuesday 16 February.

Share

MoD side-steps nuclear transport hazard warning regulations

Carrier 4 rear M40 120711

Hazard warning labels are visible on this MoD High Security Vehicle photographed in 2011. The labels are no longer carried by replacement vehicles.

 

A secret decision to exempt Ministry of Defence (MoD) nuclear transport arrangements from hazard warning legislation has been revealed as a result of questioning by Members of Parliament.

Ministers have admitted that it is “not current Ministry of Defence policy” to display radioactive material hazard signs on the special trucks used to transport military special nuclear materials or nuclear warheads. Until recently MoD vehicles transporting special nuclear materials carried hazard warning signs when transporting radioactive cargoes, but this policy has now been quietly abandoned.

MoD claims that the change is needed to maintain its policy to ‘neither conform nor deny’ the presence of nuclear weapons at a particular location – but campaigners claim that the department is placing nuclear secrecy before measures the protection of public safety.

The change in practice was disclosed in the reply to a Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Defence asked by Labour MP Paul Flynn.

Further questions from the Scottish National Party’s Owen Thompson have revealed that a decision to cease displaying radioactive material hazard warning signs on vehicles carrying special nuclear materials was made by the Defence Equipment and Support organisation in July 2011.

Penny Mordaunt, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, said that the change was implemented in 2012 in anticipation of the transition to a single type of vehicle for the transport of both nuclear weapons and special nuclear materials and was needed “in order to maintain the policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons”

The Minister claimed that MoD’s arrangements for the transport of defence nuclear materials “include the provision of information to the emergency services in the event of an incident; this does not rely on displaying radioactive material hazard warning signs”.

Jane Tallents of Nukewatch warned that under the new arrangements public safety was taking second place to secrecy.

“Although the Ministry of Defence say they inform police when nuclear convoys are on the road, they have repeatedly refused to tell fire services, the ambulance service, or local council emergency planners about convoy movements”, she said.

“If one of these convoys is involved in an accident, would fire-fighters
arriving first on the scene have to wait until police turned up to find out that they were dealing with a highly hazardous radioactive cargo rather than a
normal road traffic accident?

“Although some members of the convoy crew are trained as medics and fire-fighters, their priority is looking after the convoy and its weapons, not the public.

“The Ministry of Defence is putting secrecy about its nuclear weapons
before the safety of the general public, who it is supposed to be protecting. That can never be right”.

Throughout most of the 1990s and 2000s special nuclear materials, nuclear warhead components, and other sensitive loads were carried by special ‘High Security Vehicles’ operated by the Atomic Weapons Establishment. As civilian vehicles, these were obliged to comply with hazard warning regulations and carry warning signs when transporting radioactive materials, explosives, or hazardous chemicals.

Over the same period nuclear weapons were transported separately in their own vehicles by the armed forces, who were able to claim exemption from displaying hazard warnings on their vehicles.

In the mid-2000s the transport of all nuclear cargoes, both special nuclear materials and warheads, was contracted out by MoD to the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), and both cargoes are now carried by a single type of vehicle – the Truck Cargo Heavy Duty (TCHD) Mark 3 lorry. The TCHD trucks are operated by AWE, acting in the capacity of a civilian haulier which would not normally be exempt from hazard labelling regulations.

Despite ministerial policy that MoD should operate to safety standards at least as good as those required by legislation, the department has decided to exempt itself from this area of public protection legislation.

MoD has said that legal advice was sought and the regulator was notified before the decision to cease displaying hazard warning signs was made.

Share